Little more than four months into President Obama's first term, potential Republican rivals have begun to stir, taking preliminary steps toward 2012 presidential campaigns aimed at rejuvenating a party that has found itself at its lowest point in a generation.
Twice this week, the political community has seized on signs of activity among prospective GOP presidential candidates. On Monday, former Massachusetts governor Mitt Romney delivered a speech at the Heritage Foundation, where he slammed Obama for having taken what he called a foreign "tour of apology" this year. Romney ran unsuccessfully for his party's nomination in 2008, and his speech was seen as a forceful expression of interest in another bid.
The next day, Minnesota Gov. Tim Pawlenty announced that he will not seek reelection next year, voluntarily leaving after his second term. Pawlenty was runner-up to Alaska Gov. Sarah Palin in Sen. John McCain's 2008 vice presidential sweepstakes, and his move was interpreted as a step toward a possible 2012 presidential run, freed from the responsibilities of managing a state while campaigning full time for more than two years.
A third Republican governor, Mississippi's Haley Barbour, has scheduled appearances in New Hampshire and Iowa for later this month. Barbour, a former party chairman, will help raise money for Republicans on his forays to the two states at the front of the presidential nomination calendar. But as one of the canniest politicians in the Republican Party, Barbour knows that landing in either of those states, let alone both, will stoke speculation about his interest in 2012 as well.
And when former House speaker Newt Gingrich (Ga.) tried yesterday to roll back his accusation that Obama's Supreme Court nominee, Judge Sonia Sotomayor, was a racist, that, too, was taken as a sign of his desire to shed baggage should he decide to seek the nomination.
Presidential activity is as much illusory as real at this point, as much an opportunity to feed blog speculation and cable conversation as a sign of actual preparations for a presidential campaign. But at a time when the Republican Party is on its back, out of power in Congress and shut out of the White House, the search for prominent and popular leaders is underway and no better vehicle exists than the long process of selecting the party's next presidential nominee.
"This is a time when leaders in our party are trying to put forward a more compelling vision for voters," said Terry Nelson, a Republican strategist. "It's also a time when one group of leaders has exited the stage and a new group of leaders has to come onto the stage to effectively put forward that message."
That transition is underway, but it has been difficult. At times, the older generation of Republicans -- including former vice president Richard B. Cheney, conservative talk show host Rush Limbaugh and one or another of the party's congressional leaders -- has dominated. But many Republicans see it as essential that a different group begins to emerge to help redefine the GOP, and that has raised speculation about potential Obama challengers.
The list of prospective Republican candidates is lengthy and lacks an obvious front-runner. A CNN poll released this week showed a virtual three-way tie among Palin, Romney and former Arkansas governor Mike Huckabee, who also ran in 2008. All had about a fifth of the support of Republicans. Gingrich came in fourth, followed by former Florida governor Jeb Bush, whose family name remains an impediment to any possible near-term presidential aspirations.
The list is elastic and likely to change in coming months. Others who are considered possible candidates include South Carolina Gov. Mark Sanford, Louisiana Gov. Bobby Jindal and Sen. John Thune of South Dakota. Florida Gov. Charlie Crist is another possible candidate, though his decision to run for the Senate in 2010 would make a presidential bid in 2012 more difficult.
Some Republicans see this presidential cycle starting more slowly than they expected, held back by voter fatigue after the long 2008 campaign, by the GOP's internal problems and by Obama's popularity. Voters "clearly have been intrigued by the persona of this new president and his family," said Tom Rath, a veteran New Hampshire strategist. "There was no hunger to start a debate right away."
Others believe it is moving apace, as swiftly as in other recent cycles and out of necessity, given the demands that running for president now entail. "The last thing anybody wants to do is look back in late 2010 or early 2011 and say, 'I wish I could run. I can see how I might have a chance but I squandered all this time and I don't have anything to show,' " said GOP strategist John Weaver.
The 2008 campaign was one of the longest in history, but Republican strategists think the competition for their 2012 nomination will be as long or longer. They expect to see candidates beginning their campaigns immediately after the 2010 midterm elections, and to do that, they must spend much of the next 18 months getting ready.
Over that time, prospective candidates must gauge whether they have the political viability and the financial wherewithal to mount a successful campaign. If the last campaign is any guide, some of those now looking will conclude they have no realistic chance of winning and drop out before the campaign even begins.
"Most potential candidates are going to be looking at putting something into the field in early 2011, and you can't do that if you don't work hard for the next year and a half," Nelson said.
WASHINGTON -- Senate Finance Committee Chairman Max Baucus on Tuesday indicated that President Barack Obama may be warming to the idea of taxing employer-provided health-care benefits to pay for an overhaul of the nation's health system. But the White House, and a key Democratic senator, quickly shot down the idea that the president has had a change of heart.
Mr. Obama met with 24 Democratic senators at the White House Tuesday afternoon to talk about legislation they are crafting to overhaul the nation's health system. Senators said afterwards that the president wants a bill signed by October.
In remarks before the meeting, Mr. Obama reiterated his pledge to enact legislation that will reduce health-care costs and provide coverage to uninsured Americans. "We cannot avoid bringing about change in our health care system," he said.
To fund those changes, many Democrats and Republicans agree, the government has to begin taxing some portion of the health-care benefits that companies provide to their employees. The problem is that Mr. Obama firmly opposed this idea on the campaign trail.
But Sen. Baucus of Montana strode out of Tuesday's meeting and signaled that the president might change his view. Asked whether Mr. Obama indicated he would be open to changing the tax exemption, Mr. Baucus said it is "something he might consider."
The White House didn't quite see it that way. "The president made it clear during the campaign that he has serious concerns about taxing health care benefits, and he has introduced his own revenue proposal, which he reiterated in today's meeting," spokesman Reid Cherlin said in an email. "He made it very clear that he prefers the approach he has already outlined."
Sen. Chris Dodd of Connecticut also said after the meeting he didn't think the president was signaling a shift in his thinking.
In his budget earlier this year, Mr. Obama set aside at least $600 billion to pay for a health overhaul, which at most would cover about half the cost of the effort. Many elements of how the government is going to pay for the rest remain unclear, even as lawmakers pledge to have the legislation passed before their August break.
Obama administration advisers said Tuesday that the plan won't increase the deficit, and that there are a slew of cost savings that can be wrung out of the nation's inefficient health system that will offset the cost of expanding insurance coverage, particularly in Medicare and Medicaid.
When the clock strikes midnight on Dec. 31, 2009, Rep. Paul Broun (R-Ga.) hopes you’ll be ringing in “the Year of the Bible.”
It’s probably just wishful thinking.
Broun’s simple congressional resolution aimed at honoring the Good Book has produced a push-back of biblical proportion in the blogosphere, with critics dismissing it as either unconstitutional or a waste of time. Jews in Congress and atheist activists are dismissing the resolution, while none of the many Democrats in Congress who are Christian have bothered to sign on as co-sponsors.
Click here to read rest of story
In a letter to party supporters tonight, Greer defends his actions but said the party is now "neutral" in the contest between Charlie Crist and Marco Rubio.
"Now it is true that my conversation with my National Committee colleagues, although considered to be confidential at the time, was immediately disclosed to the press for motives I do not understand, let me conclude relating to this issue that the rule letter 11 matter is over, the National Committeewoman did as reported, refuse to sign and I do not intend to pursue the matter any further. As it relates to the Senatorial primary, the State party is neutral, no resources have been provided to one candidate over another and although I will personally support Governor Crist, I have great respect for former Speaker Rubio and his long service to our Party."
Greer's full letter, which also addresses the governor's race, is in the jump.
Dear State Committee Members,
I wanted to take this opportunity to provide each of you as brief update on several initiatives that the State Party has undertaken along with addressing certain concerns relating to Florida’s upcoming elections.
First, I am currently in Washington D.C. at the RNC State Chairmen’s meeting and I was honored to be asked by the RNC to speak to other State Chairs regarding best practices of our State Party and some of the other projects which Florida has implemented which continues to make the Florida GOP a recognized leader among the states. Each member of the state committee can be proud that through your leadership many people here at the conference comment to me that Florida’s programs such as minority voter outreach, fundraising and communications are among the best.
In addition our DriveTheDiscussion.com website and upcoming kick-off is getting much attention and we have had over 10,000 hits to the website with many new contacts along with preparation for our upcoming youth conference. I believe that this DriveTheDiscussion.com communications network along with other components will become recognized nationally which will once again show that the RPOF leads the way.
As many of you know, I have always focused on issues I believe are important to the Party’s overall success and, ultimately winning elections. Maintaining my focus on these important issues and ensuring that the staff did the same has kept me from engaging in issues that some wished to promote for motives that may not have always been in the best interest of the Party, or in many cases simply was due to a lack of credible information. This brings me to the discussions surrounding the party’s endorsement and support during potential primary’s and RNC Rule 11 along with our own RPOF Rule 9. While a small group apparently has promoted certain information which has caused concern, I wish to take a moment to clarify and provide you with accurate information.
As Governor Crist made his decision to seek the Senate seat, the National Republican Senatorial Committee (NRSC) made a decision to endorse and fully support Governor Crist in the Senate race regardless of primary election considerations. In addition, many leading Republicans immediately followed with their individual and collective endorsements. In as much as the Senatorial Committee endorsed Charlie Crist and because he is an incumbent Republican Governor who has provided unprecedented support of the Party’s financial needs and grassroots programs, it was appropriate in my opinion, to inquire if the National Committeewoman and National Committeeman would be in support of a Rule 11 letter (which has been done before in other GOP federal elections primaries, most recently for Congressman Bill Posey). I would also note that a rule 11 letter has nothing to do with the state party. It is simply a designation by the RNC and in fact due to the Senatorial Committees endorsement had little relevancy but would have been more of a procedural matter. Now it is true that my conversation with my National Committee colleagues, although considered to be confidential at the time, was immediately disclosed to the press for motives I do not understand, let me conclude relating to this issue that the rule letter 11 matter is over, the National Committeewoman did as reported, refuse to sign and I do not intend to pursue the matter any further. As it relates to the Senatorial primary, the State party is neutral, no resources have been provided to one candidate over another and although I will personally support Governor Crist, I have great respect for former Speaker Rubio and his long service to our Party.
Now as it relates to the Governor’s race, I have from the very beginning believed that the Democrats would unite around Alex Sink as they have done, avoiding a costly primary and be fully financed and prepared to challenge our Republican nominee in the general election. As Chairman, I met with and had several discussions with all the potential candidates for Governor and emphasized my belief that in this unique time, and with redistricting approaching, I needed to promote and provide leadership in insuring that our Party was unified behind one candidate for Governor and that all resources be available to combat the democrat campaign which would be formidable. After, meeting with and evaluating all of the circumstances, it became my belief that Attorney General Bill McCollum was the candidate in which “all rivers were flowing towards”. I then proceeded to insure that the Attorney General had a strong showing of support including myself at his announcement this past Monday! While my attendance did not convey official party support, I did make it clear that as Chairman all steps would be taken to unite behind General McCollum while at the same time recognizing the public service of Commissioner Bronson and the other great Republicans who considered running for Governor. I make no apologies for this decision, as I believe to do anything less would have provided our party with a significant disadvantage in the general election due to having a costly and combative primary! I would note that 15 minutes after Alex Sink declared her candidacy for Governor, the Chairman of the Florida Democrat party along with other leading democrats issued a state of endorsement and united support.
In conclusion, I would first like to thank those of you that have spoken with me by phone and email regarding these issues including those in support of my decisions and those adamantly opposed. I have been committed since becoming Chairman to providing information to the state committee more than ever before and seeking opinions and dialogue to the decisions that I am required to make as your Chairman. This is why I have taken the time to communicate to each of you through this email. It is time that our party and its leaders focus on what is important and that is winning elections and discussing the issues that are important to the voters such as the economy, health care, employment opportunities and education. Primary elections are in most cases good and provide for political discussion as in the Senate race and others, but in unique circumstances such as the Governor’s race where the Democrats will have none, I and all of us have a responsibility to WIN!!!
It is an honor to serve as your Chairman and I thank you for taking the time to read this important correspondence.
Thanks,
Jim
You are viewing
citrusgop's journal